permacomputing

Source repository for the main permacomputing wiki site
git clone http://git.permacomputing.net/repos/permacomputing.git # read-only access
Log | Files | Refs

commit b982db9d44c024dde0f4a30d5116d4faffd1ac53
parent a12405fbb26b01e35fa7ad90c739cd34afc04b27
Author: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2026 15:35:34 +0100

link to the front page

Diffstat:
Mspacehobo/antipatterns.mdwn | 2+-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/spacehobo/antipatterns.mdwn b/spacehobo/antipatterns.mdwn @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ And when you speak to many of the advocates for this system, you will discover t It is perhaps no surprise, then, that the most prominent hits on YouTube for this movement include channels that mix technical commentary with self-improvement talks and hard-right-wing political essays. -There is no political purity test in Permacomputing. Some have blanched at the phrase "post-Marxist" on our web site (and somehow misread it as "you are required to be Marxist-Leninist" or something), but that's just one of many frameworks used to approach the topic. The unifying factor is our focus on building *communities* rather than *individuals*. This inevitably leads to strong scepticism around Libertarian schools of thought. +There is no political purity test in Permacomputing. Some have blanched at the phrase "post-marxism" on [[the_front_page|index]] (and somehow misread it as "you are required to be Marxist-Leninist" or something), but that's just one of many frameworks used to approach the topic. The unifying factor is our focus on building *communities* rather than *individuals*. This inevitably leads to strong scepticism around Libertarian schools of thought. This is not to say that personal empowerment is seen as a problem in Permacomputing circles! If anything, we hope to build systems that free indviduals to make more choices than they could under modern corporate-controlled computing. But we do not require individuals to pass some sort of skill test to join in.