commit 836e03e603581aa625f59d76ee59c37c25fe84a3 parent 783051cceb7f3e26afe76dfa51ce8a25c1d0c093 Author: viznut_web <viznut_web@web> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:50:46 +0200 Diffstat:
| M | bedrock_platform.mdwn | | | 2 | +- |
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bedrock_platform.mdwn b/bedrock_platform.mdwn @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Candidates for bedrock hardware: * [[ZX Spectrum]]: Simple design that was easy enough to duplicate in Eastern-block countries even with 100% non-Western components. Clones are still manufactured, emulators are widely available. * [[MSX]]: Standardized platform, every chip used in MSX-1 computers has had both U.S.American and a Japanese manufacturers. (MSX-2 on the other hand depends on specific Yamaha chips). Emulators widely available. The firmware ROMs may pose issues as long as Microsoft exists. -[[Raspberry Pi]] is an example of a platform that fails the criteria. It depends on a single-manufacturer SoC chip (Broadcom BCM2835) that doesn't have full documentation available. QEMU emulates some versions of the platform to some extent but this emulation does not cover the undocumented parts of the chip. +[[Raspberry Pi]] is an example of a platform that fails the criteria. It depends on a single-manufacturer SoC chip (Broadcom BCM2835) that doesn't have full documentation available. QEMU emulates some versions of the platform to some extent but this emulation does not cover the undocumented parts of the chip (e.g. running the GPU firmware code). For virtual bedrock hardware, the main criterion is that the specification is simple enough that it can be implemented in a small effort for commonly available computers.