permacomputing

Source repository for the main permacomputing wiki site
git clone http://git.permacomputing.net/repos/permacomputing.git # read-only access
Log | Files | Refs

commit 5836b54b89a237714ad21bce2b66ba7d2602d040
parent 928d0b0c8c385d576bf5173e5e1389241ed0b327
Author: ugrnm <ugrnm@web>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:12:07 +0200

empty web commit

Diffstat:
MDEC.mdwn | 33+++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/DEC.mdwn b/DEC.mdwn @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ About The Damaged Earth Catalog is a growing online catalog of the different terms in circulation, used by communities of practice, in relation to computing and network infrastructure informed by ecological ethics, degrowth, resilience, repair, and minimalism. -It is currently developed by [[l03s]] as part of her PhD research. +It is currently developed by [[l03s]] as part of her PhD research. Entries on this page should point to the Damaged Earth Catalog wiki, check with [[l03s]] for suggesting new additions. Don't duplicate entries/work. [[https://damaged.bleu255.com]] @@ -18,23 +18,28 @@ At the moment [[permacomputing]] is moving from a set of interrelated ideas and To be sure, many people and collectives have independently come up with similar ideas, so there's a lot of overlap between permacomputing and other concepts such as: -* [[Frugal computing]] -* [[Degrowth computing]] -* [[Computing within Limits]] -* [[Salvage computing]] -* [[Collapse computing]] +* [Collapse Informatics](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Collapse_Informatics/) +* [Computing within Limits](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Computing_within_Limits/) +* [Degrowth](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Degrowth/) +* [Frugal computing] +* [Salvage computing](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Salvage_Computing/) * etc. And looking further there are also ideas and movements that have some similarities but maybe are not as closely related: -* [[Sustainable ICT]] -* [[Permaprogramming]] -* [[Rustic computing]] -* [[Appropriate technology]] -* [[Heirloom computing]] -* [[Permatech]] -* [[Convivial computing]] -* [[Green software engineering]] +* [Appropriate technology](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Appropriate_Technology/) +* [Begnin Computing](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Benign_Computing/) +* [Convivial computing](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Convivial_Computing/) +* [Feminist Technology](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Feminist_Technology/) +* [Green software engineering] +* [Heirloom computing] +* [Liberatory Technology](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Liberatory_Technology/) +* [Low-Tech](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Low-Tech/) +* [Permaprogramming] +* [Permatech] +* [Rustic computing] +* [Small Technology](https://damaged.bleu255.com/Small_Technology/) +* [Sustainable ICT] * etc. Is it more fruitful to think about all these ideas as different viewpoints to the same thing rather than independent "movements" whose borders need to be unambiguously defined? or on the contrary do they carry irreconcilable deviations and incompatible ideologies or world views?