commit 3e2f1454d737686edbecc5e65c482b1bfb659d3a
parent 499164411ead19e533706c03f1da1608386a1e30
Author: ugrnm <ugrnm@web>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:31:05 +0200
empty web commit
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/editing.mdwn b/editing.mdwn
@@ -29,19 +29,19 @@ When introducing a new term, please try to include a proper and non-biased defin
If you rely on other sources for the writing of a section, do not be lazy or mindlessly copypaste from other sources. In general, **do not invisibilize people from which you took inspiration and/or learned something from**. Take the opportunity of contributing to this wiki to also point to their work and research. You must properly attribute your source. You have 4 options:
-* **Hyperlinks:** Sometimes it's enough to point to external reference as an hyperlink if there is not much to discuss. For instance [Ursula Leguin has an interesting take on technology](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
-* **Footnotes:** Can be handy to drift a bit[^drift] but also to give a proper footnote reference when paraphrasing and referencing the thoughts of someone else. For instance Ursula Leguin has been critical of a specific usage of the work *technology* when misused to only refer to the most recent developments, which also happen to be the most problematic[^leguinref].
-* **Inline quotes:** Use this with footnotes when you want to quote something short inline. For instance Ursula Leguin offers to understand technology more broadly as "the active human interface with the material world"[^leguinrefquote].
-* **Block quotes:** Finally, you may want to quote entirely a part of someone else's writing, in which case, use the block quote formatting, with a footnote for the reference. For instance here is how Ursula Leguin suggests to reconsider how we use the word *technology*:
+* **Hyperlinks:** Sometimes it's enough to point to external reference as an hyperlink if there is not much to discuss. For instance [Ursula K. Le Guin has an interesting take on technology](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
+* **Footnotes:** Can be handy to drift a bit[^drift] but also to give a proper footnote reference when paraphrasing and referencing the thoughts of someone else. For instance Ursula K. Le Guin has been critical of a specific usage of the work *technology* when misused to only refer to the most recent developments, which also happen to be the most problematic[^leguinref].
+* **Inline quotes:** Use this with footnotes when you want to quote something short inline. For instance Ursula K. Le Guin offers to understand technology more broadly as "the active human interface with the material world"[^leguinrefquote].
+* **Block quotes:** Finally, you may want to quote entirely a part of someone else's writing, in which case, use the block quote formatting, with a footnote for the reference. For instance here is how Ursula K. Le Guin suggests to reconsider how we use the word *technology*:
> Technology is the active human interface with the material world.
> But the word is consistently misused to mean only the enormously complex and specialised technologies of the past few decades, supported by massive exploitation both of natural and human resources.
> This is not an acceptable use of the word. [^leguinrefquote2]
[^drift]: parenthesis could be used as well, sure, or long — em dashes, but if you're going to fork the discussion to something that's too long to fit in the flow of the main text, and that does not need its own page, then a footnote can be quite handy.
-[^leguinref]: See Ursula Leguin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
-[^leguinrefquote]: Ursula Leguin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
-[^leguinrefquote2]: Ursula Leguin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
+[^leguinref]: See Ursula K. Le Guin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
+[^leguinrefquote]: Ursula K. Le Guin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
+[^leguinrefquote2]: Ursula K. Le Guin, "A Rant About 'Technology'," 2004, [http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html](http://www.ursulakleguinarchive.com/Note-Technology.html).
#### Limitations of the footnotes
