commit 1a86170b068baad8493ddac70992634feb55da24 parent 6b164809c5378bfcae690e16e12391550044bf94 Author: neau <neau@web> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:13:35 +0200 empty web commit Diffstat:
| M | DEC.mdwn | | | 26 | +++++++++++++------------- |
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/DEC.mdwn b/DEC.mdwn @@ -18,23 +18,23 @@ At the moment [[permacomputing]] is moving from a set of interrelated ideas and To be sure, many people and collectives have independently come up with similar ideas, so there's a lot of overlap between permacomputing and other concepts such as: -* Frugal computing -* Degrowth computing -* Computing within Limits -* Salvage computing -* Collapse computing +* [[Frugal computing]] +* [[Degrowth computing]] +* [[Computing within Limits]] +* [[Salvage computing]] +* [[Collapse computing]] * etc. And looking further there are also ideas and movements that have some similarities but maybe are not as closely related: -* Sustainable ICT -* Permaprogramming -* Rustic computing -* Appropriate technology -* Heirloom computing -* Permatech -* Convivial computing -* Green software engineering +* [[Sustainable ICT]] +* [[Permaprogramming]] +* [[Rustic computing]] +* [[Appropriate technology]] +* [[Heirloom computing]] +* [[Permatech]] +* [[Convivial computing]] +* [[Green software engineering]] * etc. Is it more fruitful to think about all these ideas as different viewpoints to the same thing rather than independent "movements" whose borders need to be unambiguously defined? or on the contrary do they carry irreconcilable deviations and incompatible ideologies or world views?